Soon To Be Classics

Sunday, December 04, 2005

To Boldy Go...Again?


Apparantly Byan Singer and Patrick Stewart have been having some non-mutant discussions on the set of X3, as evident by this interesting tidbit here:

Singer Ponders Directing Next Star Trek Film

Now I'm not one to say that Bryan Singer is the "savior director" but he did do an amazing job on the X-Men and he's showing a great deal of dedication to making Superman Returns. He is at least a director that understands the genre and the fanbase (unlike perhaps, Berman & Braga).

What would be great, is that if Singer were to employ Manny Coto, the fan-turned-co executive producer of Enterprise in it's fourth season. If you weren't watching Enterprise (and many, many people weren't) you really missed a treat for Classic Star Trek fans. But, he understood what it was that made Trek the hit that it was more than probably anyone since Gene Rodenberry. Singer's direction with Coto's input would be great.

However, after the lackluster showing of Star Trek : Nemesis (which I suspect was much less about the film itself and more about the fact it was released a week prior to The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers) it's obvious that Trek has problems. Berman, Brannon and Braga have been sited by many as the prime reasons. I think as a TV series, it's a lost cause for now. But, a feature film COULD be good if the right team was attached. So in no particular order, here are some thoughts:

1) Classic Crew - We've lost both Jimmy Doohan (Scotty) and DeForest Kelly (McCoy) so a classic crew is prett much out of the question. Quite frankly, the Excelsior fan-favorite idea wouldn't work as George Takei as Sulu would not be able to hold the film. Shatner would also be pushing 80 by the time this film would roll around. It just wouldn't work.

2) Next Gen - Still viable, despite the idiotic "switch" in Data's at the end. I'm not sure you want to try and waste time picking up those pieces but it would sure be good to see Stewart in the command chair again. You could always say that Data's body wasn't destroyed and reprogram him from B4, but it's that kind of thinking that got Trek into trouble in the first place.

3) DS9 - I know that Dr. Heimlich will jump on me for this, but I never could get into this series and I don't believe it to be the best. Honestly, I thought it WASN'T Trek. I agree with Rodenberry that Trek was always about The Enterprise. Not the people. To me, DS9 was just an ugly series that took way too long to find it's way.

4) Voyager - No. Just...no.

5) Enterprise - Sadly, no as well. As much as I liked T'Pol's character as well as Tripp, the rest of them just weren't that engaging.

6) Move Forward - Pick the series up post-Next Gen. A lot of people have suggested that we could pick up after the yet-to-occur Borg War. This really starts to look a bit like Galactica though.

7) Reunification - What if Spock succeeded and the Vulcans and Romulans reunified only it went the other way? Vulcans decide that the Romulan way is correct and that Humans and Klingons, responsible for more outright war and destruction, need to be eliminated (from the Romulan perpective) or at least contained (from the Vulcan perspective).

8) Enterprise NCC-1701-M - Same story, pushed a couple hundred years into the future. Eliminate the Klingons (long since died out), push the Romulans back, introduce some new races as we expand the Federation into the galaxy. Make a Galaxy-class truly that and begin pushing into other galaxies. The Borg cannot be the worse things out there.

Anyway, those are some thoughts. Yours?

7 Comments:

  • For me, Trek was always about the philosophy behind the story. I think that any new Trek should follow that lead. The boundaries that Classic Trek pushed are, for the most part, pushed to breaking by now. What we need is a social commentary on today's issues.

    And then the Borg could show up and provide a decent catalyst for some action... ;-)

    Personally, I'm hoping that Paramount will give JMS' idea a chance - since it is mainly what I just stated above. It too was set in the far future, I believe.

    If they do decide to go with a movie before a series relaunch, the movie should act as a potential re-start for a television series.

    By Blogger Michael J. Hercus, at 2:55 PM  

  • For a TV series I would prefer a Tales of Star Trek type thing. Have the episodes be 2 to 5 episode blocks of different crews, ships, time periods. That way they could keep things exciting without the afternoon soap warped reality.

    By Blogger TMac, at 11:52 AM  

  • The problem with trying to do social commentary today is that everyone's concerned about how it will affect the bottom line. If an episode of Trek appears to be anti-abortion or pro-homosexual or whatever, people will pull advertising. Sadly, we aren't living in the late '60s anymore.

    Not that I have any good ideas...in the early '90s, I was thinking about running an RPG about the crew of a spaceship that got flung to the other end of the galaxy and had to find its way home. Look how that turned out...

    By Blogger Jason, at 9:52 AM  

  • Does Star Trek HAVE to be about social commentary? I mean, that's what made the original series a trailblazer, sure. But why does every episode have to be a moral episode?

    By Blogger Mkae, at 6:43 PM  

  • I've seen the majority of the original series and enjoyed seeing Kirk and Co fly all over the unknown universe, but to me TNG and Picard will always come to mind first when I think of Star Trek. I completely agree that DS9 didn't feel like Star Trek and goodness knows my interest in a movie based on that story arc would pale in comparison to the others. What I think I'd like to see is something a little more back to basics, but still touches on something current. Gimme a good ol' ship-to-ship space brawl. Let's say a more formal alliance between the humans and the Klingons was forged, possibly absorbing the Klingons into the Federation (did that already happen?). This then pisses off the Romulans because they become afraid that the Fed now has "legal" access to cloaking devices, so they team up w/the Cardassians and invade Federation space looking for evidence of the feared cloak-enabled fed ships (WMD's anyone?). Lots of phasers and proton torpedos later things work out fine (or does a rogue fed-cloak ship escape the battle?), but all the while the crew and various factions debate invading another culture looking for a threat that might not exist. Sound familiar? Of course, in the movie it would be the "good guys" getting invaded.

    Or maybe we just say screw the storyline and watch an interstellar demolition derby w/all the crew manning/captaining a different ship. Go w/the ol' Marine philosophy - when in doubt, blow it up!

    By Blogger Unknown, at 6:59 PM  

  • Star Trek currently has the potential to create a new 'Star Trek 6' type movie. (the more I think about this there are a number of paralells between ST: V and Nemesis) Riker has moved on to another ship (taking Troi with him) and Picard is still on the Enterprise. So you could legitimately have 2 ships doing a number of things (all in all, probably protecting, or defending the Federation in some way).

    All the ideas I have read here (and on other message boards) are good, and I think that Paramount should not let the TNG ship sail just yet.

    Additionally I do not understand the distain to the DS9 franchise. It was CLEARLY the best written and developed series among the 5. While I think coming up with a stupid reason to reunite them all is a bad idea (re: no movie) I think there is no comparison that it was the best of the Star Trek franchise.

    By Blogger BubbaJoe, at 9:39 AM  

  • I'm content with not seeing any new Star Trek in the next several years. This isn't because it's old news and I only want to watch the latest, hottest thing. I just don't see a point to any new Star Trek other than giving fans more of the details and niceties they want rather than the good writing that was lost along the way.

    I'm also in the The Big Reset Button camp.

    By Blogger GiromiDe, at 11:23 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home